This story is currently available in англійська only — a translation isn't ready yet.
Anfield Will Not Keep Score Today, It Will Render Judgment
Manchester City stands condemned, Liverpool seethes with anger, and Maresca steps into Anfield for the first time with the advantage belonging to the opposition.


A British sports outlet reported this morning that City has never faced such a toxic and hostile environment. It was not a fan saying this, but journalists who have covered the club for years. And that sentence is the best answer to those who want to reduce today's match to a single line on the league table.
To be frank, Manchester City travels to Anfield six points clear — leading with 15 points. Liverpool sits in sixth, six points behind. But these figures carry almost secondary weight right now; City has been found guilty of financial misconduct spanning the 2009–10 through 2017–18 seasons in the Premier League. The club is both convicted and appealing. That paradox is what travels to Anfield today.
Meanwhile, Liverpool supporters' anger has history. In the 2013–14, 2018–19, and 2021–22 seasons — in the last two by a single point — they lost the championship to City. The legal scrutiny placed on the vast sums City spent during that period has legitimized Anfield's accumulated grievance. Today the crowd will carry it onto the pitch. The stands will respond not only to a rival team, but to an unanswered question about a justice system that has yet to deliver its final verdict.
So what does the historical balance between the two teams say? In 202 encounters, Liverpool has won 95 times while City has triumphed only 53; the remaining 53 ended level. At Anfield, Liverpool was favored in nearly every era. But recent form runs in City's favor — and that is not wrong.
Now look at the desks of Enzo Maresca and Andoni Iraola. Maresca works at the helm of the Premier League's most controversial club, operating under a legal shadow. Iraola, in his pre-match remarks, underscored that uncertainty. That uncertainty takes the pitch today.
I have been thinking for some time: in football history, matches played immediately after a conviction rarely settle into such a symbolic frame. If City scores today, the stands will not read it simply as a goal. If Liverpool comes back, the atmosphere will present it as a kind of symbolic justice. Football will be played on the pitch, but Anfield's interpretation has always been bigger than the score.
How what happens at Anfield today is read — alongside City's appeal process — is what I will be following.